Supreme Court in Pennsylvania throws out Trump campaign appeal, paving way for certification of results

82,089FansLike
2,966FollowersFollow
2,700SubscribersSubscribe
82,089FansLike
3,122FollowersFollow
2,700SubscribersSubscribe

Updated: March 7, 2021

The Supreme Court in Pennsylvania has thrown out a Trump campaign appeal seeking to invalidate millions of mail-in ballots and paving the way for the election results to be certified there for President-elect Joe Biden.

President Donald Trump’s legal team on Sunday filed an appeal to a federal judge’s ruling that dismissed his campaign’s effort to block the certification of votes in Pennsylvania.

[read_more id="2" more="Read full article" less="Read less"]

A federal judge on Saturday called the Trump campaign lawsuit challenging President-elect Joseph R. Biden’s win in Pennsylvania “Frankenstein’s Monster” before dismissing it.

“This claim, like Frankenstein’s Monster, has been haphazardly stitched together,” U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann wrote.

The lawsuit, which had attempted to invalidate millions of mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania, dealt another blow to the President’s narrowing legal options.

The dismissal of the lawsuit, which accused Pennsylvania officials of enabling voter fraud, has now opened the way for the state to certify President-elect Joseph R. Biden’s victory.

In rejecting the arguments made by President Trump’s lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, Judge Matthew Brann said the Trump campaign used the lawsuit to attempt to disenfranchise legally cast votes.

Giuliani had argued that Pennsylvania’s mail-in ballots procedures presented the opportunity for widespread fraud.

Judge Brann said in his ruling that the lawsuit was marred by “strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations unsupported by evidence.”

“Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters,” Brann said Saturday. “This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated,” Judge Brann said.

“One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens,” he added.

About 34 legal claims filed by the Trump administration have now been thrown out by various judges.

[/read_more]

Simon Ateba Washington DC
Simon Ateba
Simon Ateba covers the White House, the U.S. government, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and other financial and international institutions for Today News Africa in Washington D.C. Simon can be reached on simonateba@todaynewsafrica.com

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Trending Now

TRENDING

Nobel Peace Prize winning Prime Minister of Ethiopia Abiy Ahmed under fire for ethnic cleansing and human rights abuses

Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed was awarded the 2019 Nobel Peace Prize for “his efforts to achieve peace and international cooperation.” However, he has recently become the subject of intense scrutiny after multiple reports have found him responsible for leading violent ethnic cleansing in the Tigray Region.In the entire history of the Nobel Peace Prize, which has been around for well over a century, the...

Stay connected

[/read_more]

[read_more id="2" more="Read full article" less="Read less"]

error: Alert: Content is protected !!
Share
Tweet
Reddit
Pocket
Share
More